Electrical
- Building Wire
- Energy Efficiency
- Motor Upgrades Help Cut HVAC Energy Costs
- Case Study: Brass Mill Cuts Costs with NEMA Premium Motors
- Copper-Wound Transformers
- Case Study: Company Saves $200,000 with Energy Efficiency Motors
- Proper Transformer Sizing & Copper Windings
- Case Study: Kodak Focuses on NEMA Premium Motors
- Premium-Efficiency Motors Mean Big Savings
- MotorSlide Calculator
- Premium Efficiency Motors
- Premium-Efficiency Motors & Transformers CD-ROM
- One Wire Size Up Means Big Savings
- Copper Saves You Money
- Case Study: Skating Arena Cuts Energy Costs with Premium-Efficiency Motors
- Case Study: Energy-Efficient Transformer Yields 156% ROI
- Calculating Energy Savings
- High-Efficiency Utility Transformers Mean Lowest Total Owning Cost
- Temperature Rise and Transformer Efficiency
- Transformer Life Cycle Cost
- Introduction to Transformer Losses
- Casse Study: Weyerhaeuser Energy Policy Yields Rapid Payback
- Have a Good Story to Tell?
- Case Study: Copper and Wind Energy
- Case Study: Transformer Manufacturer Uses Only Copper
- Case Study: Bryant University Saves Energy Cuts Costs With All-Copper Systems
- Case Study: Shaw Industries Demands NEMA PremiumĀ® Efficiency Motors
- CDA Offers Speakers
- Motor Systems Training
- The 2007 Energy Act: Good News for Motor Users
- Motor Upgrades Help Cut HVAC Energy Costs
- Power Quality
- Case Study: Copper Grounding Saves Big Money
- Case Study: Lightning Protection System
- Case Study: Copper-based Grounding System Ends Lightning Damage
- Case Study: Value of Proper Grounding
- Case Study: Copper Corrects Power Quality Problems
- Case Study: Copper Checks in @ Internet Hotel
- Case Study: New Grounding System Ends Lightning
- Case Study: Copper Grounding System Protects Mt. Washinghton Towers
- Case Study: Copper Grounding Stops Lightning Damage
- Case Study: Copper Conductors Help Upgrade a 20-Year-Old Electric System
- Case Study: All-Copper Grounding Systems End Million Dollar Losses
- Case Study: All-Copper Grounding Network Ensures Reliability
- Case Study: Florida Credit Union Data Center Shrugs Off Direct Lightning Hit
- Case Study: All-Copper Electrical & Grounding Systems Ensure Reliability at First Data Teleservices
- Electrical Needs of Today & Tomorrow
- Harmonics & Grounding
- Power Quality CD-ROM
- Wiring for Power Quality
- Bibliography of Information Sources
- A Power Quality Primer
- Do You Have a Story to Tell?
- Case Study: Allegheny Power Insists on Copper For Substation Transformers
- Case Study: Copper Protects MIT Computer Center
- Case Study: Power Quality Gets Top Grades at Business-Oriented University
- Case Study: Copper Grounding Saves Big Money
- Busbar
- Industry Links
Go Beyond Minimum Requirements
NEMA Premium® Motors Mean Big Savings, Fast Payback and Higher Reliability
In the industrial sector of the USA, motor-driven loads account for about 60% of all the electrical energy used. In the commercial sector, motors account for almost half of all electricity used. Therefore, selection of an efficient electric motor, either as a new purchase or as a replacement for a failed unit, is critical to both energy and dollar savings.
With load cycles typical of an industrial or commercial application, the first cost of a motor may represent only one or two percent of the full cost of ownership. The electricity used to run the motor can run 10 to 20 times the purchase price each year.
Defining "Premium" Efficiency
The Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) have agreed on a joint specification defining a "premium" efficiency motor. Motors meeting this minimum specification are eligible to carry the NEMA Premium®, designation and exceed the EPAct minimum efficiencies in each covered category. The NEMA Premium motors program covers single-speed, polyphase, 1-500 hp, and 2-, 4- or 6-pole squirrel cage induction, NEMA design A or B, continuous rated motors. CDA has publications available that compare NEMA Premium efficiencies to EPAct minimums.
The examples on the reverse side compare standard EPAct minimum-efficiency motors to comparable NEMA Premium models, operating at 75% of nameplate load, along with the annual savings and payback times. The lower operating costs using NEMA Premium motors may result in greater value and save energy expenses. Results that can go right to the bottom line! It pays to do the math, and there are tools available to help you do just that.1
Having a Plan
There are three occasions for purchasing a new motor: when an existing motor has not failed, but may be inefficient; when an existing motor fails; and when installing a new process or piece of equipment. Each of these calls for an evaluation of the most cost-effective choice for the particular circumstance.
Many large companies, operating hundreds or thousands of motors, have found it prudent to have a motor repair/replacement plan. Using tools such as MotorMaster+, described below, these companies have examined their motor population in advance and have determined which motors may warrant replacement, even if they are still operating. This may be especially true of older motors, whose efficiencies may be so low that energy savings alone can pay for the replacement in a short time.
The second occasion occurs when a motor fails in service. Since production may be down, the need for a replacement is immediate and the result is frequently a fast, but uneconomical, on-the-spot decision. By having a motor plan in place, each motor has been pre-evaluated based on energy use and efficiency, and the proper course of action arranged in advance. One large wood products company has screened all their motors, and determined in advance that all motors 50 hp or less are to be replaced when they fail with NEMA Premium, while failed motors above 50 hp are to be evaluated, based on age, number of times repaired, efficiency, etc. This way, the individual plant operator does not have to make a spot decision in a crisis; the evaluation has already been performed. The motor vendor stocks premium-efficiency inventory for fast replacement.
Remember that when an older motor of poor efficiency fails, it can never be rewound to exceed its original efficiency.
The final case is choosing the proper motor for a new application, including motors that are part of a larger piece of equipment. This circumstance is the ideal time to evaluate the savings and payback times offered by a new motor of NEMA Premium efficiency, or better. Tools such as MotorMaster+ can help in this evaluation. Most motor manufacturers, and better motor shops, can assist with this decision.
And when purchasing new OEM equipment, ask prospective suppliers to submit their bids based on premium-efficiency motors and components. The environment will benefit, along with your bottom line.
Rebates
Some electric utilities or public agencies offer rebates toward the purchase of high-efficiency motors.
Call your local utility to determine if your prospective motor purchase qualifies for a rebate.
Useful Tools for Motor Purchasing Decisions
As an Allied Partner of the Department of Energy's Motor Challenge Program, CDA can provide you with a copy of DOE's MotorMaster+ software2 as well as other publications on energy efficiency topics. The MotorMaster+ software contains technical and pricing information on thousands of integral-horsepower motors, efficiency data, and can assist with life-cycle cost comparisons, rewind vs. replace decisions, and much more.
CDA can also send you a MotorSlide Calculator™, a slide rule tool to quickly determine the approximate operating cost of a specific motor or the annual savings possible when choosing a more efficient motor over a less efficient model of comparable size. The calculator also has a built-in table of NEMA Premium nominal efficiencies versus EPAct minimums, for quick reference.
Please call (888) 480-MOTR for your copy of either or both tools.
Higher-Efficiency Motors Mean Big Savings and Better Reliability
| Example One 50 hp, 1800 rpm, 460 V |
Example Two 25 hp, 1800 rpm, 460 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAct Standard | NEMA Premium | EPAct Standard | NEMA Premium | |
| Full Load Efficiency | 93.1* | 94.5 | 92.4 | 93.6 |
| Efficiency (at 75% load) | 93.6 | 95.1 | 93.1 | 94.1 |
| Demand Reduction (at 75% load) | 0.47 kW | 0.16 kW | ||
| Meets EPAct? | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Incremental Motor Cost | $176 | $96 | ||
| Energy Savings at 75% Load (6000 hrs/year) | 2,829 kWh/y | 958 kWh/y | ||
| *EPAct minimum efficiency for this size motor is 93.0%. The model chosen for comparison has an efficiency of 93.1%. | ||||
| Example Three 10 hp, 1800 rpm, 460 V |
Example Four 5 hp, 1800 rpm, 460 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAct Standard | NEMA Premium | EPAct Standard | NEMA Premium | |
| Full Load Efficiency | 89.5 | 91.7 | 87.5 | 89.5 |
| Efficiency (at 75% load) | 90.8 | 92.6 | 88.2 | 90.3 |
| Demand Reduction (at 75% load) | 0.12 kW | 0.07kW | ||
| Meets EPAct? | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Incremental Motor Cost | $60 | $27 | ||
| Energy Savings at 75% Load (6000 hrs/year) | 719k Wh/y |
443 kWh/y | ||
Benefits of using the higher-efficiency motor:
| Duty Cycle | Energy Cost, $/kWh | Annual Savings | Payback, in Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $141 | 15 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $212 | 10 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $283 | 7 |
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $170 | 12 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $255 | 8 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $339 | 6 |
| Duty Cycle | Energy Cost, $/kWh | Annual Savings | Payback, in Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $48 | 24 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $72 | 16 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $96 | 12 |
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $57 | 20 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $86 | 13 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $115 | 10 |
| Duty Cycle | Energy Cost, $/kWh | Annual Savings | Payback, in Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $36 | 20 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $54 | 13 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $72 | 10 |
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $43 | 17 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $65 | 11 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $86 | 8 |
| Duty Cycle | Energy Cost, $/kWh | Annual Savings | Payback, in Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $22 | 15 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $33 | 10 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.075 | $44 | 7 |
| 4,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $27 | 12 |
| 6,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $40 | 8 |
| 8,000 hrs/Year | $0.09 | $53 | 6 |
Many manufacturers have product lines that exceed NEMA Premium® efficiency levels, so look for the most economical choice that will suit your task. In addition, if replacing a pre-EPAct motor, potential savings may greatly exceed those shown here.
The motors above all meet the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) minimums. Savings do not include possible reductions in demand charges or utility rebates. All examples are derived from MotorMaster+, Version 3.0. For a copy, please call Copper Development Association Inc., (888) 480-MOTR. U.S. addresses only, please. MotorMaster+ contains data on integral-horsepower motors usually found in industrial and commercial settings. Typical residential-size motors are not included.
Premium-Efficiency motors are those as defined in the NEMA Premium® Efficiency Motor Program. Please call your electricity supplier to learn about any available efficiency rebate programs.
![]() |
References
Highlights
Busbar section includes AC and DC ampacity tables, mechanical properties, sources, and additional engineering information.
Learn more about Premium-Efficiency Motors & Transformers CD-ROM
Energy Efficiency Case Studies:
Furniture Manufacturer Realizes 7-month Payback With All-Copper Transformer
It’s Proven!!Using Improved Motors Produce Huge Savings and Fast Paybacks.
Find out how...
Do You Have an Energy Efficient Story to Tell?
CDA is interested in hearing how your company has saved money by choosing copper. More info…
Order Energy Efficiency Educational and Technical Publications

